Appraisal-Based Audit of Ideological Bias in Large Language Models Across Politics, Gender, Culture, and Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.65840/jllcd.v3i1.37

Authors

  • Ebenezer Agbaglo The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Emmanuel Mensah Bonsu The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

generative artificial intelligence, Appraisal Theory, ideological bias, discourse analysis, critical AI literacy

Abstract

This study examines how large language models construct evaluative meanings in response to political, gender, cultural, and technological issues. Using a qualitative-descriptive approach based on content analysis and Appraisal Theory frameworks, this study analyzed the outputs of ChatGPT, Gemini, and Claude to identify the patterns  of Affect, Judgment, and Graduation in the framing of discourse. The results show that the AI response is not neutral, but contains systematic ideological biases. The emerging pattern shows a tendency to legitimize the liberal-Western paradigm through the strengthening of individual autonomy, criticism of state authority, and moral judgments that favor certain perspectives, while the Global South view  is often given a more problematic framing of the Global South. In the gender realm, AI still reproduces a double bind to female leadership; in the cultural realm, AI tends to highlight anxiety over homogenization; and in the technological realm, AI displays strong epistemic insecurities. These findings confirm that AI output needs to be understood as a discursive practice that helps shape the legitimacy of meaning, so biased audits, algorithmic transparency, and critical AI literacy are needed in the use of generative systems.

References

Alghazo, S., Rabab'ah, G., Salam El-Dakhs, D. A., & Mustafa, A. (2025). Engagement strategies in human-written and AI-generated academic essays: A corpus-based study. Ampersand, 15, 100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2025.100237

Amoore, L., Campolo, A., Jacobsen, B., & Rella, L. (2024). A world model: On the political logics of generative AI. Political Geography, 113, 103134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103134

Anders, A. D., & Dux Speltz, E. (2025). Developing generative AI literacies through self-regulated learning: A human-centered approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100482

Archambault, S. G., Ramachandran, S., Acosta, E., & Fu, S. (2024). Ethical dimensions of algorithmic literacy for college students: Case studies and cross-disciplinary connections. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 50(3), 102865. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2024.102865

Bazazi, S., Karpus, J., & Yasseri, T. (2025). AI's assigned gender affects human-AI cooperation. IScience, 28(12), 113905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2025.113905

Bengtsson, M. (2016). How to plan and perform a qualitative study using content analysis. NursingPlus Open, 2, 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.npls.2016.01.001

Berber Sardinha, T. (2024). AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 4(1), 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100083

Chen, B., Zhang, Z., Langrené, N., & Zhu, S. (2025). Unleashing the potential of prompt engineering for large language models. Patterns, 6(6), 101260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2025.101260

Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171

Chuan, C.-H., Sun, R., Tian, S., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2024). EXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) for facilitating recognition of algorithmic bias: An experiment from imposed users' perspectives. Telematics and Informatics, 91, 102135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2024.102135

Currie, G., Hewis, J., & Ebbs, P. (2025). Gender bias in text-to-image generative artificial intelligence depiction of Australian paramedics and first responders. Australasian Emergency Care, 28(2), 103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.auec.2024.11.003

Erlingsson, C., & Brysiewicz, P. (2017). A hands-on guide to doing content analysis. African Journal of Emergency Medicine, 7(3), 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.08.001

Francisco, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2023). AI and the governance of sustainable development. An idea analysis of the European Union, the United Nations, and the World Economic Forum. Environmental Science & Policy, 150, 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103590

Hashemi, A., & Mahdavirad, F. (2023). A cross-cultural, cross-disciplinary, and cross-gender study on Appraisal resources in PhD dissertation abstracts: Martin & White's (2005) Appraisal Theory in focus. Heliyon, 9(11), e22074. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22074

Ho, J. Q. H., Hartanto, A., Koh, A., & Majeed, N. M. (2025). Gender biases within Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT: Evidence, Sources of Biases and Solutions. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 4, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100145

Jiang, F. (Kevin), & Hyland, K. (2025). Rhetorical distinctions: Comparing metadiscourse in essays by ChatGPT and students. English for Specific Purposes, 79, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2025.03.001

Kasapoglu, T., Masso, A., & Calzati, S. (2021). Unpacking algorithms as technologies of power: Syrian refugees and data experts on algorithmic governance. Digital Geography and Society, 2, 100016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2021.100016

Kashiha, H. (2025). From algorithms to annotations: Rethinking feedback practices in academic writing through AI-human comparison. Journal of Second Language Writing, 70, 101254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101254

Khalifa, M., & Albadawy, M. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J. M. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225

Kong, X., & Liu, C. (2024). A comparative genre analysis of AI-generated and scholar-written abstracts for English review articles in international journals. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 71, 101432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2024.101432

Lim, S., & Schmälzle, R. (2024). The effect of source disclosure on evaluation of AI-generated messages. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100058

Liu, N. T. Y., Kirshner, S. N., & Lim, E. T. K. (2023). Is algorithm aversion WEIRD? A cross-country comparison of individual-differences and algorithm aversion. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 72, 103259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103259

Longo, L., Brcic, M., Cabitza, F., Choi, J., Confalonieri, R., Ser, J. Del, Guidotti, R., Hayashi, Y., Herrera, F., Holzinger, A., Jiang, R., Khosravi, H., Lecue, F., Malgieri, G., Páez, A., Samek, W., Schneider, J., Speith, T., & Stumpf, S. (2024). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) 2.0: A manifesto of open challenges and interdisciplinary research directions. Information Fusion, 106, 102301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2024.102301

Ma, M., Ng, D. T. K., Liu, Z., & Wong, G. K. W. (2025). Fostering responsible AI literacy: A systematic review of K-12 AI ethics education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100422

Mahmud, H., Islam, A. K. M. N., Ahmed, S. I., & Smolander, K. (2022). What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 175, 121390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121390

Messer, U. (2025). How do people react to political bias in generative artificial intelligence (AI)? Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 3, 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100108

Monteiro, N., & Singh, V. (2025). The wheel of artificial intelligence governance. Sustainable Futures, 10, 101279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2025.101279

Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Wu, C., Wu, M., & Ho, T. Y. (2025). Generative AI tools and empowerment in L2 academic writing. System, 133, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103779

Motoki, F. Y. S., Pinho Neto, V., & Rangel, V. (2025). Assessing political bias and value misalignment in generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 234, 106904. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2025.106904

Newstead, T., Eager, B., & Wilson, S. (2023). How AI can perpetuate – Or help mitigate – Gender bias in leadership. Organizational Dynamics, 52(4), 100998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2023.100998

Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041

Park, J. (2025). A systematic literature review of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) literacy in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 9, 100487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100487

Pinski, M., & Benlian, A. (2024). AI literacy for users – A comprehensive review and future research directions of learning methods, components, and effects. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 2(1), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2024.100062

Schilke, O., & Reimann, M. (2025). The transparency dilemma: How AI disclosure erodes trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 188, 104405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2025.104405

Stolpe, K., & Hallström, J. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy for technology education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100159

Su, J., Ng, D. T. K., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Artificial Intelligence (AI) Literacy in Early Childhood Education: The Challenges and Opportunities. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100124

Veldhuis, A., Lo, P. Y., Kenny, S., & Antle, A. N. (2025). Critical Artificial Intelligence literacy: A scoping review and framework synthesis. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 43, 100708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100708

Wei, X., Kumar, N., & Zhang, H. (2025). Addressing bias in generative AI: Challenges and research opportunities in information management. Information & Management, 62(2), 104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2025.104103

White, P. R. (2025). Appraisal theory and the analysis of point of view in news and views journalism – unpacking journalistic “persuasiveness.” Language & Communication, 100, 95–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.11.005

Whitehead, M., & Collier, W. G. A. (2023). Incidental governmentality: Big tech and the hidden rationalities of government. Digital Geography and Society, 5, 100071. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2023.100071

Downloads

Published

2026-04-24

How to Cite

Appraisal-Based Audit of Ideological Bias in Large Language Models Across Politics, Gender, Culture, and Technology. (2026). Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Dynamics, 3(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.65840/jllcd.v3i1.37

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Appraisal-Based Audit of Ideological Bias in Large Language Models Across Politics, Gender, Culture, and Technology. (2026). Journal of Language, Literature, and Cultural Dynamics, 3(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.65840/jllcd.v3i1.37